top of page

We Analyzed The Mayoral Debate

ree

Policies and Actions Showing Integrity:

  1. Support for Housing and Community Development:

    • Several candidates, including Jyoti Gondek and Sonia Sharp, emphasized efforts to improve housing affordability and expand options like secondary suites. Their commitment to creating a housing strategy demonstrates integrity by prioritizing accessible, dignified living conditions for all residents.

    • Gondek’s mention of land sales and incentives for affordable housing, along with her openness to community involvement, reflect transparency and a focus on equitable development.

  2. Commitment to Infrastructure and Public Safety:

    • Candidates like Jeromy Farkas and Jeff Davidson addressed infrastructure issues transparently, acknowledging past failures (e.g., water main breaks, delays in transit projects) and proposing clear plans for modernization and repair. Farkas’ emphasis on accountability and a responsible water utility shows integrity in fiscal responsibility.

    • Davidson’s advocacy for a transparent budget process and his stance on fixing infrastructure issues like potholes and water systems highlight integrity through accountability.

  3. Transparency and Participatory Governance:

    • Several candidates committed to restoring community input (e.g., in rezoning and development processes) and improving communication, indicating integrity by valuing public trust and input.

    • Sharp, in particular, emphasized the importance of listening and engaging with residents, including those with lived experience, which underscores a commitment to honest, empathetic governance.

  4. Collaborative Leadership:

    • Some candidates, notably Davidson and Farkas, highlighted the importance of building consensus and working collaboratively across political divides. This reflects integrity through a focus on unity and effective governance rather than partisan conflict.

  5. Accountability:

    • Many candidates discussed the importance of accountability in decision-making, whether in transportation projects like the Green Line or infrastructure repairs, indicating integrity by taking ownership of successes and failures.

Summary:

Overall, the debate revealed candidates striving to demonstrate integrity through commitments to transparency, responsible fiscal management, participatory governance, and prioritized investments in infrastructure, public safety, and equitable housing. Their approaches suggest a focus on rebuilding public trust and ensuring that policies serve the best interests of Calgarians.

 
 
bottom of page